Search
The search found 15 results in 0.01 seconds.
Search results
-
Dovetailing Details Fly Apart — All Over, Again, in Code, in Poetry, in Chreods
"Dovetailing Details Fly Apart - All Over, Again, In Code, In Poetry, In Chreods" by Strickland and Lawson Jaramillo carries the debate into the analysis of specific poems and poetic practices, both written and spoken, graphic and sonic, alphabetically and digitally coded. The essay also introduces a new reference for the debate - namely, the work of Gregory Bateson, who is cited not just as a supporting 'theory' or philosphical framework, but in the spirit of differential discourse that distinguishes Bateson's work.
(Source: introduction at electronic book review)
Scott Rettberg - 26.02.2011 - 22:59
-
Voice of the Shuttle (Vos)
Voice of the Shuttle (Vos)
Eric Dean Rasmussen - 02.09.2011 - 14:25
-
Nature is What Hurts
In this review of Timothy Morton’s Hyperobjects, Robert Seguin contemplates the implication of the text’s eponymous subject on art, philosophy, and politics. The “hyperobject,” a hypothetical agglomeration of networked interactions with the potential to produce inescapable shifts in the very conditions of existence, emerges as the key consideration for the being in the present.
(source: http://electronicbookreview.com/thread/criticalecologies/hurts)
Malene Fonnes - 22.09.2017 - 10:25
-
Cyberinthian Ways
Linda Brigham hypercontextualizes contemporary philosophy.
Although a hard-copy book and a hypertext essay hardly present us with apples and oranges, this particular pair troubles the work of comparison. This trouble is not simply a matter of form. Content-wise as well, Arkady Plotnitsky’s interdisciplinary exploration of poststructural metaphysics (or “meta-physics”) and David Kolb’s meditation on the textuality of philosophy relate to each other in a fashion at once too intimate and divergent. Like Blake’s Clod and Pebble from the Songs of Experience, they are contraries, or, to pick up the theme, “complementary.” As Blake would insist, though, it is through such contraries that progress happens.
tye042 - 26.09.2017 - 10:38
-
From Virtual Reality to Phantomatics and Back
Paisley Livingston on Stanislaw Lem and the history and philosphy of Virtual Reality.
tye042 - 05.10.2017 - 14:20
-
“Persist in Folly”: Review of Mark Greif, The Age of the Crisis of Man: Thought and Fiction in America, 1933-1973
Afterthoughts on the end of the sixties, the death of the author, the rise of Theory and the fall of humanism.
Source: Author's abstract
Ana Castello - 16.10.2017 - 16:36
-
The Primacy of the Object
In his review of Martin Paul Eve’s Pynchon and Philosophy: Wittgenstein, Foucault and Adorno, Julius Greve situates this new book on Pynchon within the upheavals produced by speculative realism and contemporary discourses on materialism. In doing so, Greve reminds us of what was always already the case: the literary-philosophical relevance of Pynchon, which turns out to be all the more inescapable in contemporary political climates.
Source: Author's abstract
Ana Castello - 16.10.2017 - 17:41
-
Recounting Signatures: A Review of James McFarland’s Constellation
In reviewing James McFarland’s Constellation, Donald Cross reminds readers of the rich potential of scholarly discourse. Beyond mere citations and their absence, Cross traces across the bright stars of Nietzsche and Benjamin (and Derrida) relationships worthy of serious consideration. In an age of copy/paste citations, impact reports, and optimized academics, pondering the constellations offers an opportunity to rediscover the subtle intensity of tracing forms in the void.
Source: Author's abstract
Ana Castello - 17.10.2017 - 14:45
-
Digital Revision
In this analytical, unabashedly philosophical engagement with Alex Galloway’s “sneakily-titled” Laruelle Against the Digital, Martin Eve sides with the skeptics for whom “Laruelle proves a better diagnostician of epistemic illness than he is prescriber of a cure.”
Source: Abstract
Ana Castello - 17.10.2017 - 15:03
-
Love Will Tear Us Apart, Again: Tupitsyn Art Review
McKenzie Wark explores the work of Masha Tupitsyn as a pathway into the conditions of life in the 21st Century, somewhere above (or below) the framework of mediated experience, even beyond the limits of what we often call “theory.” With Tupitsyn, Wark troubles the current stasis of representation that stultifies thought in this age of unrepentantly industrialized culture, not by turning us away from the spectacle, but by smashing right through it, picking up its pieces, and discovering new things in the wreckage.
Source: Abstract
Ana Castello - 17.10.2017 - 15:23