Search

Search content of the knowledge base.

The search found 15 results in 0.009 seconds.

Search results

  1. Reading at the Thresholds of Book Covers and Opening Screens

    In this article I relate Gérard Genette’s paratext theory Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation (1997) that was originally published in French as Seuils in 1987 to theories that relate to what presumably constitutes narrative beginnings (Kellman; Richardson; Rabinowitz). Genette’s theory considers different liminal devices as that which “guide a reader’s reading” such as for example a book cover. Among other’s, I explore reader comments that reflect on their reading experience of book covers expressed in social media environments such as goodreads.com and the blogosphere. I propose that the book cover potentially foreshadows it’s content proleptically (Genette) and in a centripetal (McCracken) notion draws to a book’s content. Two examplary “openings” as thresholds to a narrative are considered: the book cover of the paper-based publication Borgerligt tusmørke by Simon Fruelund and Voyage into the Unkown (Roderick Coover), a work of literature published in programmable media.

    Patricia Tomaszek - 02.07.2013 - 11:09

  2. Literacy between book, page and screen – on Between Page and Screen by Amaranth Borsuk and Brad Bouse

    The aim of the speech will be to show that e-literature realizations not only could be a renovation of avant-garde or even earlier tradition, but also in many cases provoke the same kind of questions which were made by theoreticians of (e.g.) formalism or structuralism in relation to avant-garde or modern text. Looking at electronic texts we re-ask about a literacy of those works and have to renovate our conception of literary communication, re-thinking not only the category of the text (as Aarseth did), but also the character of signs and code used in this kind of communication.

    Jill Walker Rettberg - 23.08.2013 - 10:26

  3. Loss of Hover: Re-implementing Director Vniverse as an App for Tablet

    Proposal:
    V appeared in 2002, distributed across an invertible two-in-one print book from
    Penguin, V : WaveSon.nets / Losing L’una, and two online locations: the first, V:
    Vniverse, a Director project with Cynthia Lawson published in the Iowa Review Web,
    and the second, Errand Upon Which We Came, a Flash piece with M.D. Coverley
    published in Cauldron and Net. The print book contained at its center, approached
    from either direction, the url for the Vniverse site.

    Elias Mikkelsen - 12.02.2015 - 14:57

  4. Canon Goes Mobile: Ludosemiotics of Remediation

    Modern forms of literature frequently question our reading habits, and provoke us to re-define the act of reading and the book form. The “magic” of the book, described by Bezos as its ability to be an invisible device that disappears in the reader’s hands, permitting them to enter a story-world, is nowadays replaced by the “real magic” of non-invisible interfaces. The latest manifestations of these interfaces invite us to do things we usually do not do while reading: to touch, to shout, or to shake the device. In the other words, our reading becomes a very sensual and corporeal action and our “reading behaviour” is important for discovering the meaning of the work. That’s why we need a revision of poetics (Simanowski 2009), like Bouchardon’s theory of gestural manipulation as a literary figure (2014). 

    Scott Rettberg - 29.08.2018 - 14:56

  5. The Urban Metainterface

    Examples of everyday urban experiences with interfaces are numerous: TripAdvisor provides access restaurants, and other sights that are otherwise not clearly visible in the urban landscape; with Airbnb, any apartment in the city holds the invisible potential of a bed and breakfast, etc. In other words “every street corner and every local pub leads a double life.” (de Waal). The interface is however not just an interface to the city, but is a meta-construction that within itself holds a particular urban gaze (Andersen and Pold). This presentation focuses on the black box of the urban metainterface, and how the city is textualized beyond the street sign and the billboard; and how this produces a particular territoriality and perception of space. The urban metainterface depends on an ability to capture the user’s behaviors: the more the interface opens up the city – to diverse behaviors and signification – the more it needs to monitor the users and their milieu, and process these data. The more we read, the more we are being read. But what are the aesthetic mechanisms of seeing and walking in the city, whilst being seen and being guided? 

    Jana Jankovska - 05.09.2018 - 16:09

Pages