Search

Search content of the knowledge base.

The search found 3 results in 0.008 seconds.

Search results

  1. “III=II=I=I=II=III”

    A network- and laptop- distributed language art performance based on texts that have been processed and regenerated in terms of the typo- and orthographic dimensionalities of their supply compositions, with phrase selection based on indexed occurrence counts hacked from Google.

    (Source: Author's abstract, 2012 ELO Conference site)

    Eric Dean Rasmussen - 14.06.2012 - 14:51

  2. Reading Writing Interfaces by Lori Emerson

    Lori Emerson's Reading Writing Interfaces is a media archeology of the interface. A critique of the "invisible" interface, the "magic" of iOS that "just works," Emerson analyzes how interfaces promote or occlude human agency in computational environments. Anti-telelogical in order to interrupt the "triumphalist" narratives of progress that can characterize much writing about media, Reading Writing Interfaces stages its four chapters and postscript ("The Googlization of Literature") as "ruptures" to emphasize failure as a key element of media development.

    Kathi Inman Berens - 19.09.2014 - 16:49

  3. Beyond the Googlization of Literature: Writing Other Networks

    It's true, poets have been experimenting with producing writing (or simply writing, just writing of a sort not familiar to us - writing as input and writing as choosing) with the aid of digital computer algorithms since Max Bense and Theo Lutz first experimented with computer-generated writing in 1959. What is new and particular to the 21st century literary landscape is a revived interest in the underlying workings of algorithms, not just a concern with the surface-level effects and results that characterized much of the fascination in the 1970s and 1980s with computer-generated writing. With the ever-increasing power of algorithms, especially search engine algorithms that attempt not just to "know" us but to in fact anticipate and so shape our every desire, our passive acceptance of these algorithms necessarily means we cannot have any sense of the shape and scope of how they determine our access to information, let alone shape our sense of self which is increasingly driven by autocomplete, autocorrect, automata.

    Daniela Ørvik - 17.02.2015 - 15:47