Search

Search content of the knowledge base.

The search found 2 results in 0.008 seconds.

Search results

  1. We Descend: Archives Pertaining to Egderus Scriptor, Volume Two

    Every writing addresses someone; this someone is often said to be the author's Ideal Reader. But "ideal" connotes a conceptualized, even perpetrated entity that is an entirely different creature from the real person one addresses when speaking. Now it may be useful to make this distinction in order to discuss, in the abstract, the *process* of writing, but the *practice* is wholly different: in writing anything, you address a real person, and, by addressing, conjure that person into your presence — the "materiality" of this being is, well, immaterial. When a real reader (in contrast to an ideal one) takes up an author's writing, she encounters not a voice speaking to *her*, or not to her directly: she comes in on a conversation already in progress, between the author and the person he is addressing in the writing. Given a sense of the occasion she has just joined, she will wisely keep still at first and pay attention, not just to the author's voice, but also to the silence of the other person listening to him at that moment. Thus she comes to know them both.

    Eric Dean Rasmussen - 14.06.2012 - 16:09

  2. Abandoning Canon: Fluid Texts and Implicit Collaboration in Electronic Narratives

    Digital technology enables artists - photographers, musicians, writers, filmmakers, illustrators,
    animators, etc. - to place their work not in a strictly definable where, but effectively everywhere
    (everywhere, that is, where infrastructure and access are available). Where once the lines between
    author, text, and reader could be drawn with linear vectors, digital technology and their increasing
    availability and accessibility bring author, text, and reader into a potentially endless cycle of narrative, creation, wherein the roles are fluid and the text may never be fixed. Because of this capability, Astrid Ensslin argues that the idea of literary canon must depart from "its traditional self-contained, closed, and rigidly exclusive connotations. Instead, an inclusive, open concept has to be adopted, which works in terms of a continuous process of integration, modification and discharge" (2006, n.p).

    (Source: Author's abstract, 2012 ELO Conference site)

    Eric Dean Rasmussen - 21.06.2012 - 13:53